In the village of League of Vietnam, in addition to Zeros, if you have to find another name that is often associated with the dramas, even has been taken to television, it is the male streamer S. – a former member of the SBTC streamer group and once a close brother of teacher Ba. After many groves in the past, S. officially stepped into the direction of building content and activities in favor of the field of “red and black” and controversial even for his own fans.
Teacher Ba and Nam Streamer S. used to be very close to each other
Recently, Nam Streamer S. continued to be accused of fraudulent acts of his audience. Specifically, in one event organization for their audience to participate, after being transferred by everyone, S. again had the behavior to escape the livestream without the reunion date. Not to mention, according to the “victim”, there were about 400 people making bank transfer for S. and each about 100k, this number is extremely large. Worth mentioning, then S. also automatically blocked the contents on the channel related to the incident, including the chat lines that require the male streamer to return the money.
Male streamer S. was accused of fraud
However, the post of “victim” after the incident of Nam Streamer S. received most of the mixed opinions of the online community. According to the vast majority, the core of the incident is that many people have brought themselves into traps and to lose money. Even many people even frankly said: “S.'s story, everyone knows. S. does not hold anyone to play. This is self -suffering, no one can help”. Not to mention, the act of participating in S.'s activities, in reality, is also a violation of the law, so it is almost certain that it will be difficult for the “victims” to ask the authorities.
But many opinions think that the “victims” themselves have created conditions for S.
It can be said that S. carrying out “black red” activities is one thing. But it is the audience of the male streamer who also participates in his activities day by day and that is probably really the main cause, accidentally “helping” for S. to continue his behaviors.