After falling down, T1 recently lit the hope of winning the MSI 2024 title with the victory over Teamliquid (TL) with a score of 3-1. Despite the resistance from TL, but with superior class, representatives from LCK still know how to overcome difficulties to continue. The upcoming match T1 promises to be much more difficult when they will meet a opponent with a lot of “predestined debt” is G2 Esports.
The last victory also helped T1 ensure a position in the top 4 at MSI 2024
In the match against TL, Zeus is considered the bright spot of the T1 side when this player often shows the ability to go overwhelming compared to the Impact. Moreover, contributing to Zeus's common play is not small with good champions on the wing road like Camille, Vayne. So normally, Zeus will be graded high after the victory over TL.
Zeus is considered the bright spot of T1 in the victory over TL
However, the LPL audience community on the Hupu forum only dot Zeus to reach 4.9 points in the last match. Moreover, the unreasonable point here is that this score is lower than Impact, although Zeus is the one who performs better in the match. Because of the intentional score of “drowning” Zeus, even neutral audiences have to speak up.
Zeus only received 4.9 points (lower than Impact) from the Hupu community of the LPL area
“I don't understand why they score Zeus so low, I think he and Gumayusi are the most stable players on the T1 side in this Bo5 series” – A audience said
“Zeus has only 4.9 points, do they see the game?” – Another pressing audience shared
“Zeus deserves a much higher score” – a gamer shared
If you look back on the match between T1 and TL, the audience can easily recognize Zeus's complete overwhelming over the top lane. Even in the 3rd game that received the defeat of the home team, Zeus still showed the superiority to the elder in the ability to travel, control the wing when more than the Impact to more than 50 soldiers. Therefore, Zeus must receive the above low score is very unfair.
Even in the game T1 failed, Zeus still shows the ability to go overwhelmingly before Impact
This unfair grading is probably from Faker and his juniors who have sown sorrow for the LPL area at Worlds 2023 last year. Even in the match against EST, they were graded by LPL audience lower than the LLA representative even though the new T1 was the team that won 2-0. It would not be too surprising if this continued to happen regardless of how well the LCK representative played.
Not only ZEU
Naturally, the above points do not affect the strength or achievement of T1. The important thing for this team is to keep the winning circuit in the upcoming matches. That is the best way for T1 to confirm the strength as well as prove that negative assessments of them are not accurate.